Top Articles

When designing a custom zygomatic arch implant, the primary goal is usually not projection but controlled lateralization of the arch to create the desired increase in upper facial width while maintaining a natural skeletal contour.

Key Design Parameters

1. Amount of Width Increase

This is the most important variable.

Typical augmentation:

  • 3–5 mm per side: usuall amoiunt of widening for most patients
  • 5 – 7 mm per side: aignificant widening
  • > 8 mm per side: large/extreme widening, rare

Because width increases on both sides, a 7 mm implant per side creates approximately 14 mm of total bizygomatic width increase.

2. Location Along the Arch

The implant can emphasize:

Anterior arch

  • Near the malar prominence
  • Blends with cheek augmentation
  • Creates more three-quarter-view definition

Middle arch

  • Maximum widening effect
  • Often the ideal location for skeletal expansion

Posterior arch

  • Extends toward the root of the arch near the ear
  • Produces a broader upper-face frame
  • Must be designed carefully to avoid visibility in thin tissues

3. Shape Profile

A custom implant can be designed as:

Uniform width increase

This means that the width increase is the same along its whole length

Central Flare

Most projection occurs in the middle or front part of the arch.

Posterior flare

Creates width farther back toward the temporal region.

4. Vertical Position

The implant can:

  • Stay centered on the arch
  • Add slight superior fullness
  • Add slight inferior fullness

Most aesthetic designs remain centered to preserve natural anatomy.

5. Edge Transitions

One of the most important features of custom design.

The implant should:

  • Feather gradually into native bone
  • Avoid abrupt step-offs
  • Extend sufficiently beyond the area of maximal augmentation

A well-designed implant is often almost invisible on CT except at the area of maximum projection.

Stand-Alone vs Combined Designs

Pure Arch Implant

Used when:

  • Cheek projection is already adequate
  • Face is narrow
  • Goal is width only

Front view:

   |     |

  /       \

/         \

After widening:

  |       |

/         \

/           \

Malar-Arch Implant

Most common custom design.

Advantages:

  • Adds anterior cheek projection
  • Adds lateral width
  • Creates a continuous cheekbone contour

This avoids the appearance of having a prominent arch but a flat anterior cheek.

CT-Based Design Considerations

When designing from a 3D CT:

  • Measure current bizygomatic width.
  • Evaluate temporal hollowing.
  • Determine cheek projection relative to orbital rim.
  • Assess soft-tissue thickness over the arch.
  • Simulate different lateralization values.
  • Ensure the implant does not encroach on the temporalis muscle origin.

The best custom designs are usually judged from:

  1. Frontal view.
  2. Three-quarter view.
  3. Skeletal overlay measurements.

The actual implant often looks surprisingly small on the computer model; even a 5–7 mm lateral displacement of the arch can produce a noticeable increase in facial width.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Plastic Surgeon

Top Articles